L05 — Atom Browser

L01 (57) L02 (42) L03 (103) L04 (36) L05 (103) L06 (56) L07 (44) L08 (40) MP01 (61) MP02 (32) MP03 (65) MP04 (48) MP05 (68) MP06 (45)
103 Atoms
ID Name Family Definition File
L05-GEN-MIAHANDOFFVALID MIA Handoff Validation GEN Validates that MIA output contains all required fields for handoff to L06 assessment agents L05-GEN-MIAHANDOFFVALID.json
L05-GEN-MMC04TIMEAVAIL MMC04 Time Availability Constraint GEN Multimodal Learning Theory, Cognitive Load Theory L05-GEN-MMC04TIMEAVAIL.json
L05-GEN-MMS09CYCLICALP MMS09 Cyclical Progression GEN Multimodal Learning Theory, Cognitive Load Theory L05-GEN-MMS09CYCLICALP.json
L05-GEN-MODALITYMAPPIN modality_mapping_json_contract GEN Multimodal Learning Theory, Cognitive Load Theory L05-GEN-MODALITYMAPPIN.json
L05-MCG-ATTRIBUTION Content Attribution Compliance MCG Measures compliance with attribution requirements for curated content (CC-BY, creator credit, source linking) L05-MCG-ATTRIBUTION.json
L05-MCG-AUDIOGENQUAL Audio Content Generation Quality MCG Measures the quality of AI-generated audio content including narration clarity, pacing, pronunciation accuracy, and audio fidelity L05-MCG-AUDIOGENQUAL.json
L05-MCG-CONTENTACCESS Curated Content Accessibility Check MCG Verifies that discovered content (YouTube video, OER resource) is still accessible and not removed, made private, or geo-blocked L05-MCG-CONTENTACCESS.json
L05-MCG-GAPIDENTIFY Objective Gap Identification MCG Measures the degree to which learning objectives NOT covered by curated content have been identified for supplementary generation L05-MCG-GAPIDENTIFY.json
L05-MCG-IMAGEGENQUAL Image Content Generation Quality MCG Measures the quality of AI-generated images including relevance to content, visual clarity, educational value, and accessibility L05-MCG-IMAGEGENQUAL.json
L05-MCG-INTEGRATEQUAL Curated-Generated Integration Quality MCG Measures how seamlessly curated content integrates with generated supplements (style consistency, transition quality, coherent narrative) L05-MCG-INTEGRATEQUAL.json
L05-MCG-INTERACTGENQUAL Interactive Content Generation Quality MCG Measures the quality of AI-generated interactive elements including quizzes, simulations, drag-drop activities, and clickable diagrams L05-MCG-INTERACTGENQUAL.json
L05-MCG-MSACOMPLI MSA Modality Specification Compliance MCG Measures compliance with the modality selections, constraints, and accessibility requirements specified by MSA L05-MCG-MSACOMPLI.json
L05-MCG-OBJCOVERAGE Learning Objective Coverage MCG Measures the degree to which generated content covers all specified learning objectives from the LODA output L05-MCG-OBJCOVERAGE.json
L05-MCG-OVERLAYQUAL Accessibility Overlay Quality MCG Measures the quality of accessibility overlays (captions, transcripts, alt-text, audio descriptions) added to curated content L05-MCG-OVERLAYQUAL.json
L05-MCG-PROMPTALIGN Generation Prompt Alignment MCG Measures how well the generated content aligns with the MSA modality specification and generation prompt requirements L05-MCG-PROMPTALIGN.json
L05-MCG-TEXTGENQUAL Text Content Generation Quality MCG Measures the quality of AI-generated textual content including clarity, accuracy, pedagogical appropriateness, and reading level alignment L05-MCG-TEXTGENQUAL.json
L05-MCO-MULTICHANNELCO Multi-Channel Concurrency Demand MCO Evaluates the requirement for simultaneous processing of multiple information channels (e.g., audio, visual text, and visual graphics) within a single modality configuration. It measures the structura L05-MCO-MULTICHANNELCO.json
L05-MCO-PRIMARYSENSORY Primary Sensory Channel Dominance MCO Evaluates the degree to which a modality configuration relies on a single dominant sensory channel (e.g., visual, auditory, or haptic) for information delivery. It measures the representational constr L05-MCO-PRIMARYSENSORY.json
L05-MCP-COHERENCE Mayer Coherence Principle Compliance MCP Measures the degree to which generated content excludes extraneous words, graphics, and sounds that do not support the learning objective L05-MCP-COHERENCE.json
L05-MCP-IMAGE Mayer Image Principle Compliance MCP Measures appropriate use of speaker/instructor images - present when beneficial, absent when distracting L05-MCP-IMAGE.json
L05-MCP-MODALITY Mayer Modality Principle Compliance MCP Measures the preference for spoken narration over on-screen text when graphics are present L05-MCP-MODALITY.json
L05-MCP-MULTIMEDIA Mayer Multimedia Principle Compliance MCP Measures the integration of visual elements (pictures, diagrams, animations) with textual content L05-MCP-MULTIMEDIA.json
L05-MCP-PERSONALIZATION Mayer Personalization Principle Compliance MCP Measures the degree to which content uses conversational, first/second person language rather than formal third-person style L05-MCP-PERSONALIZATION.json
L05-MCP-PRETRAINING Mayer Pre-training Principle Compliance MCP Measures the presence and quality of pre-training content that introduces key concepts before the main lesson L05-MCP-PRETRAINING.json
L05-MCP-REDUNDANCY Mayer Redundancy Principle Compliance MCP Measures absence of redundant on-screen text that duplicates narration when graphics are present L05-MCP-REDUNDANCY.json
L05-MCP-SEGMENTING Mayer Segmenting Principle Compliance MCP Measures the degree to which content is broken into manageable, student-paced segments with clear boundaries L05-MCP-SEGMENTING.json
L05-MCP-SIGNALING Mayer Signaling Principle Compliance MCP Measures the presence and effectiveness of cues (headings, arrows, highlights, emphasis) that guide attention to essential information L05-MCP-SIGNALING.json
L05-MCP-SPATIALCONTIG Mayer Spatial Contiguity Principle Compliance MCP Measures the spatial proximity of related text and graphics elements in generated content L05-MCP-SPATIALCONTIG.json
L05-MCP-TEMPORALCONTIG Mayer Temporal Contiguity Principle Compliance MCP Measures the temporal synchronization of related narration and graphics in generated content L05-MCP-TEMPORALCONTIG.json
L05-MCP-VOICE Mayer Voice Principle Compliance MCP Measures the humanness and friendliness of audio narration voice quality L05-MCP-VOICE.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONAUDI Adaptation Audit Trail Verification MMA Evaluates whether every executed modality switch or adaptation event is accompanied by an immutable audit log recording the specific causal trigger, the logic rule applied, the timestamp, and the stat L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONAUDI.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONDONO Adaptation 'Do No Harm' (Extraneous Load) Verification MMA Evaluates whether a proposed modality switch or adaptive intervention risks increasing extraneous cognitive load (distraction, interface friction, split attention) without a guaranteed pedagogical ben L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONDONO.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONEFFE Adaptation Effectiveness Evidence Tracking MMA Evaluates whether the adaptive system actively tracks and correlates post-adaptation student outcomes against pre-adaptation baselines to validate the efficacy of the modality switch, ensuring the eng L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONEFFE.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONLEAR Adaptation Student Agency Verification MMA Evaluates whether the adaptive logic respects student agency by requiring explicit confirmation, providing an opt-in/opt-out mechanism, or offering a negotiation step before executing a significant mo L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONLEAR.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONOVER Adaptation Overfitting Prevention (Signal Persistence) MMA Evaluates whether the adaptive logic includes mechanisms for signal smoothing, hysteresis, or persistence checking to prevent 'overfitting' the instructional path to short-term, isolated, or noisy dat L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONOVER.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONRESP Adaptation Response Distinction (Support vs. Progression) MMA Evaluates whether the adaptive logic explicitly categorizes its output actions into 'Support' (remedial, scaffolding, slowing down) versus 'Progression' (acceleration, enrichment, advancing), ensuring L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONRESP.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONSTAB Adaptation Stabilization Period Verification (Anti-Oscillation) MMA Evaluates whether the adaptive logic enforces a mandatory 'stabilization period' or 'cool-down window' following a modality switch, preventing rapid oscillation between states (flip-flopping) and ensu L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONSTAB.json
L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONTRIG Adaptation Trigger Definition Verification MMA Evaluates whether the adaptive instructional system has explicitly defined, measurable trigger conditions (e.g., performance thresholds, engagement drops, error patterns, time-on-task variances) that L05-MMA-ADAPTATIONTRIG.json
L05-MMA-MODALITYSWITCH Modality Switch Cost Estimation MMA Evaluates the estimated 'transaction cost' (cognitive re-orientation, temporal latency, technical friction) of a proposed modality switch against the projected pedagogical benefit, preventing adaptive L05-MMA-MODALITYSWITCH.json
L05-MMC-ACCESSIBILITYC Accessibility Constraint Verification MMC Evaluates whether the selected modality complies with the explicit accessibility requirements defined in the student's profile (e.g., WCAG standards, assistive technology support), acting as a hard fi L05-MMC-ACCESSIBILITYC.json
L05-MMC-BANDWIDTHANDNE Bandwidth and Network Stability Adaptation MMC Evaluates whether the selected modality and its specific bitrate/format are compatible with the student's current estimated network bandwidth and stability, ensuring that high-latency or low-bandwidth L05-MMC-BANDWIDTHANDNE.json
L05-MMC-CULTURALCOMMUN Cultural Communication Norm Verification MMC Evaluates whether the interaction patterns and communication styles required by the selected modality align with the student's declared cultural communication norms (e.g., power distance, collectivism L05-MMC-CULTURALCOMMUN.json
L05-MMC-DEVICECAPABILI Device Capability Constraint Verification MMC Evaluates whether the hardware and software requirements of the selected modality (e.g., screen real estate, processing power, audio output) are compatible with the detected or declared capabilities o L05-MMC-DEVICECAPABILI.json
L05-MMC-DYNAMICCONTEXT Dynamic Context Re-evaluation Verification MMC Evaluates whether the instructional delivery system maintains active triggers for re-evaluating modality suitability upon significant changes in context (e.g., bandwidth drop, environment shift), prev L05-MMC-DYNAMICCONTEXT.json
L05-MMC-INSTITUTIONALR Institutional Resource and Licensing Constraint Verification MMC Evaluates whether the specific tools, software licenses, physical facilities, or equipment required by the selected modality are currently available, licensed, and accessible within the student's inst L05-MMC-INSTITUTIONALR.json
L05-MMC-LINGUISTICCAPA Linguistic Capability and Load Verification MMC Evaluates whether the linguistic complexity and language settings of the selected modality align with the student's declared language proficiency (L1/L2 status), triggering support mechanisms or modal L05-MMC-LINGUISTICCAPA.json
L05-MMC-PHYSICALENVIRO Physical Environment Constraint Verification MMC Evaluates whether the student's current physical environment (e.g., noise levels, privacy, lighting, shared space) is compatible with the sensory and interaction demands of the selected modality (e.g. L05-MMC-PHYSICALENVIRO.json
L05-MME-ALGORITHMICBIA Algorithmic Bias and Fairness Verification MME Evaluates the modality recommendation logic for potential bias patterns, ensuring that decisions are not skewed by protected attributes (e.g., gender, ethnicity) or prohibited proxy variables, and ver L05-MME-ALGORITHMICBIA.json
L05-MME-DATAMINIMISATI Data Minimisation Compliance Verification MME Evaluates whether the set of student data signals requested for modality adaptation is strictly limited to variables that have a defined influence on the decision logic, identifying and blocking 'over L05-MME-DATAMINIMISATI.json
L05-MME-EQUITYANDLOWRE Equity and Low-Resource Pathway Verification MME Evaluates whether the instructional design supports digital equity by maintaining at least one viable 'low-resource' or 'offline-capable' pathway (e.g., text, audio-only, PDF) alongside high-bandwidth L05-MME-EQUITYANDLOWRE.json
L05-MME-STUDENTOVERRID Student Override and Opt-Out Mechanism Verification MME Evaluates whether the instructional delivery interface provides a functional, accessible, and non-punitive mechanism for the student to override, opt-out of, or manually alter the system-generated mod L05-MME-LEARNEROVERRID.json
L05-MME-MODALITYRECOMM Modality Recommendation Explainability Verification MME Evaluates whether every algorithmic modality recommendation, adaptation, or restriction is accompanied by a technically accessible and human-readable rationale (local explanation), ensuring the system L05-MME-MODALITYRECOMM.json
L05-MME-PEDAGOGICALOPT Pedagogical Optimisation Target Legitimacy MME Evaluates whether the optimization function driving the modality personalization engine targets valid pedagogical outcomes (e.g., mastery, retention, skill transfer) rather than narrow behavioral prox L05-MME-PEDAGOGICALOPT.json
L05-MME-PERSONALIZATIO Personalization Data Consent Verification MME Evaluates whether a valid, active, and specific consent basis exists for accessing and processing the student's personal data (e.g., traits, preferences, history) within the modality selection logic, L05-MME-PERSONALIZATIO.json
L05-MME-STEREOTYPEREIN Stereotype Reinforcement Avoidance MME Evaluates the modality adaptation logic to detect and flag deterministic mapping rules that rely on demographic stereotypes (e.g., age, gender, culture) to assign specific content types, preventing th L05-MME-STEREOTYPEREIN.json
L05-MME-SURVEILLANCEAN Surveillance and Biometric Constraint Verification MME Evaluates whether the instructional delivery system impermissibly mandates invasive surveillance signals (e.g., always-on webcam, gaze tracking, biometric authentication) as a condition for accessing L05-MME-SURVEILLANCEAN.json
L05-MML-CHALLENGEMODAL Challenge Modality Exposure (Anti-Narrowing) MML Evaluates whether the longitudinal modality pathway includes periodic 'challenge modality' exposures (formats outside the student's primary preference zone) to prevent skill atrophy and representation L05-MML-CHALLENGEMODAL.json
L05-MML-STUDENTPREFERE Student Preference Data Collection MML Evaluates whether the system possesses a record of the student's stated (explicit) or demonstrated (implicit) preference for specific instructional modalities, creating the data basis for agency-orien L05-MML-LEARNERPREFERE.json
L05-MML-MESHINGHYPOTHE Meshing Hypothesis Rejection MML Evaluates whether the modality assignment logic implicitly or explicitly relies on the scientifically unsupported 'meshing hypothesis' (that matching instructional mode to a preferred learning style i L05-MML-MESHINGHYPOTHE.json
L05-MML-METACOGNITIVER Metacognitive Rationale for Preference Choices MML Evaluates whether student-facing modality choices are accompanied by explicit rationales, affordance summaries, or content previews that support metacognitive calibration, ensuring that preference dec L05-MML-METACOGNITIVER.json
L05-MML-MODALITYOPTION Modality Option Provision (Agency Check) MML Evaluates whether the instructional design provides a choice set of at least two valid modality options to the student, safeguarding student agency and self-determination unless specific prohibitive c L05-MML-MODALITYOPTION.json
L05-MML-PREFERENCEOBJE Preference-Objective Conflict Resolution MML Evaluates the system's logic for resolving conflicts between a student's stated modality preference and the strict representational demands of the learning objective, ensuring that resolution involves L05-MML-PREFERENCEOBJE.json
L05-MML-PREFERENCEROLE Preference Role Definition (Engagement vs. Performance) MML Evaluates whether the system's usage of student preference data is explicitly scoped to influence engagement, satisfaction, or motivation metrics, rather than being treated as a causal mechanism for d L05-MML-PREFERENCEROLE.json
L05-MMO-COGNITIVECOMPL Cognitive Complexity (Bloom) Identification MMO Evaluates whether the target learning objective includes a defined cognitive complexity level (specifically aligned to Bloom's Taxonomy or a functional equivalent) to constrain modality selection. L05-MMO-COGNITIVECOMPL.json
L05-MMO-FORMATSUBSTITU Format Substitution vs. Affordance Shift MMO Evaluates whether a proposed alternative modality or modality switch represents a genuine shift in representational affordance (e.g., text to visual) versus a mere 'format substitution' (e.g., PDF to L05-MMO-FORMATSUBSTITU.json
L05-MMO-HIGHSOCIALENGA High Social Engagement Affordance Availability MMO Evaluates whether the instructional modality plan includes at least one 'high social engagement' affordance (e.g., synchronous chat, collaborative whiteboard, live audio) when the pedagogical strategy L05-MMO-HIGHSOCIALENGA.json
L05-MMO-STUDENTNOVELTY Student Novelty Tolerance Integration MMO Evaluates whether the student's estimated tolerance for novelty (or Openness to Experience) has been utilized to calibrate the complexity, unfamiliarity, or experimental nature of the selected modalit L05-MMO-LEARNERNOVELTY.json
L05-MMO-STUDENTSELFREG Student Self-Regulation to Structure Mapping MMO Evaluates whether the student's estimated self-regulation capacity has been utilized to determine the appropriate level of instructional guidance, navigational freedom, and structural scaffolding with L05-MMO-LEARNERSELFREG.json
L05-MMO-STUDENTSOCIABI Student Sociability Signal Integration MMO Evaluates whether an external student sociability or interaction-need signal has been successfully ingested and used to parameterize the social affordances of the selected modality (e.g., isolating vs L05-MMO-LEARNERSOCIABI.json
L05-MMO-LEARNINGOBJECT Learning Objective Domain Identification MMO Evaluates whether the target learning objective has been explicitly classified into a primary domain (cognitive, affective, or psychomotor) to support modality alignment decisions. L05-MMO-LEARNINGOBJECT.json
L05-MMO-LOWSOCIALEXPOS Low Social Exposure Pathway Availability MMO Evaluates whether the instructional modality plan includes at least one valid 'low social exposure' or independent study option when the primary modality involves high social visibility or collaborati L05-MMO-LOWSOCIALEXPOS.json
L05-MMO-MODALITYALLOCA Modality Allocation for Mixed Objectives MMO Evaluates whether instructional segments containing multiple or compound learning objectives (e.g., hybrid cognitive/psychomotor tasks) have explicitly allocated distinct modalities to each objective L05-MMO-MODALITYALLOCA.json
L05-MMO-MODALITYASSESS Modality-Assessment Alignment MMO Evaluates whether the functional capabilities of the selected modality support the specific interaction and output mechanisms required by the planned assessment strategy (e.g., performance demonstrati L05-MMO-MODALITYASSESS.json
L05-MMO-MODALITYREPRES Modality-Representation Alignment MMO Evaluates whether the intrinsic representational affordances of the selected modality (e.g., spatial, temporal, simulative) match the representational requirements explicitly declared by the learning L05-MMO-MODALITYREPRES.json
L05-MMO-MODALITYSUCCES Modality Success Criteria Definition MMO Evaluates whether the selected modality mapping includes an explicit, measurable criterion for success (e.g., completion status, interaction count, assessment score threshold) to distinguish between m L05-MMO-MODALITYSUCCES.json
L05-MMO-OBJECTIVEBASED Objective-Based Modality Justification MMO Evaluates whether the selected instructional modality is explicitly justified by the pedagogical demands of the learning objective (e.g., representational requirements, complexity) rather than relying L05-MMO-OBJECTIVEBASED.json
L05-MMO-TRAITADAPTATIO Trait Adaptation Framing Verification MMO Evaluates whether trait-informed modality recommendations are presented to the student as navigable 'support options' or suggestions, rather than as deterministic 'fixed labels' or rigid diagnoses, th L05-MMO-TRAITADAPTATIO.json
L05-MMO-TRAITBASEDEXCL Trait-Based Exclusionary Constraint Check MMO Evaluates whether student trait signals are being used to impermissibly exclude, hide, or block access to valid instructional modalities (hard gating), enforcing the principle that traits should infor L05-MMO-TRAITBASEDEXCL.json
L05-MMS-HIGHGUIDANCEEN High Guidance Entry Verification (Novice Scaffolding) MMS Evaluates whether the initial instructional segments of a sequence provide high levels of guidance (e.g., worked examples, modeling, explicit instruction) when the student is identified as a novice in L05-MMS-HIGHGUIDANCEEN.json
L05-MMS-METACOGNITIVER Metacognitive Reflection Step Verification MMS Evaluates whether the instructional sequence includes explicit, dedicated nodes or interaction prompts designed to trigger metacognitive consolidation (e.g., self-explanation, summary generation, conf L05-MMS-METACOGNITIVER.json
L05-MMS-MODALITYSEQUEN Modality Sequence Explicit Specification MMS Evaluates whether the collection of instructional modalities is organized into an explicit, directed sequence (e.g., linear, branching, or graph-based), distinguishing a designed learning path from an L05-MMS-MODALITYSEQUEN.json
L05-MMS-PREMATUREABSTR Premature Abstraction Avoidance Verification MMS Evaluates whether abstract, symbolic, or theoretical representations are structurally 'gated' or preceded by concrete, sensory, or grounded representations within the sequence, preventing the introduc L05-MMS-PREMATUREABSTR.json
L05-MMS-REMEDIATIONBRA Remediation Branch Verification (Anti-Looping) MMS Evaluates whether the instructional sequence structure includes explicit branching logic for remediation (alternative instructional pathways) triggered by performance breakdown, ensuring that students L05-MMS-REMEDIATIONBRA.json
L05-MMS-REPRESENTATION Representational Practice Alignment Verification MMS Evaluates whether the instructional sequence includes active practice opportunities or interaction nodes that are explicitly aligned to and paired with preceding representational (informational) steps L05-MMS-REPRESENTATION.json
L05-MMS-RETRIEVALPRACT Retrieval Practice Opportunity Verification MMS Evaluates whether the instructional sequence includes specific interaction nodes designed to trigger 'retrieval practice' (active recall from memory) rather than mere 'review' (passive re-exposure), e L05-MMS-RETRIEVALPRACT.json
L05-MMS-SCAFFOLDINGWIT Scaffolding Withdrawal (Guidance Fading) Verification MMS Evaluates whether the instructional sequence includes specific logic or rules for 'fading' (reducing) guidance and support structures as student competence increases, ensuring that modalities shift fr L05-MMS-SCAFFOLDINGWIT.json
L05-MMS-TRANSFERTASKVE Transfer Task Verification (Novel Context Application) MMS Evaluates whether the instructional sequence includes a 'transfer task'—an application activity situated in a novel context distinct from the initial instruction—to verify that the student can general L05-MMS-TRANSFERTASKVE.json
L05-MMT-ABSTRACTCONTEN Abstract Content Scaffolding Verification MMT Evaluates whether content classified as highly abstract, theoretical, or conceptual is accompanied by required scaffolding representations—specifically concrete examples, analogies, or visualizations— L05-MMT-ABSTRACTCONTEN.json
L05-MMT-CONTENTCOMPLEX Content Complexity and Density Management MMT Evaluates whether the estimated information density and complexity of the content are compatible with the information transmission rate and cognitive load profile of the selected modality, ensuring th L05-MMT-CONTENTCOMPLEX.json
L05-MMT-CONTENTSEGMENT Content Segmentation and Chunking Verification MMT Evaluates whether complex, long-form, or information-dense content is structurally divided into manageable segments (chunking) or offers user-controlled pacing breaks, preventing cognitive overload ca L05-MMT-CONTENTSEGMENT.json
L05-MMT-CONTENTTYPOLOG Content Typology Classification MMT Evaluates whether the instructional content asset has been explicitly classified into a fundamental typology (e.g., Conceptual, Procedural, Affective, or Hybrid) to enable affordance-based mapping and L05-MMT-CONTENTTYPOLOG.json
L05-MMT-MODALITYREDUND Modality Redundancy Risk Verification MMT Evaluates whether the simultaneous use of multiple modalities (e.g., Audio + Text) results in detrimental redundancy (the 'Redundancy Effect') where identical information is presented via competing ch L05-MMT-MODALITYREDUND.json
L05-MMT-MOTORANDPROCED Motor and Procedural Skill Affordance Verification MMT Evaluates whether content identified as requiring psychomotor skill acquisition or procedural execution is mapped to a modality that supports dynamic demonstration (modeling) or interactive practice ( L05-MMT-MOTORANDPROCED.json
L05-MMT-SIGNALINGANDAT Signaling and Attention Guidance Verification MMT Evaluates whether complex or visually/auditorily dense content includes explicit signaling cues (e.g., highlights, arrows, vocal emphasis, headers) to guide student attention to essential material, th L05-MMT-SIGNALINGANDAT.json
L05-MMT-SPATIALSTRUCTU Spatial Structure Affordance Verification MMT Evaluates whether content identified as possessing inherent spatial structure (e.g., topology, geometry, anatomy, geography) is mapped to a modality capable of visual, diagrammatic, or haptic represen L05-MMT-SPATIALSTRUCTU.json
L05-MMT-SPLITATTENTION Split-Attention Risk Verification MMT Evaluates whether the spatial layout or temporal synchronization of instructional elements forces the student to split their attention between disjoint, non-integrated sources (e.g., a diagram with a L05-MMT-SPLITATTENTION.json
L05-MMT-TEMPORALSEQUEN Temporal Sequencing Affordance Verification MMT Evaluates whether content identified as possessing inherent temporal properties (e.g., sequential processes, chronological history, rhythm, dynamic change over time) is mapped to a modality that suppo L05-MMT-TEMPORALSEQUEN.json
L05-MQS-ACCESSCOMPLI Accessibility Compliance Score MQS Measures compliance with accessibility standards including alt-text, captions, transcripts, contrast ratios, and screen reader compatibility L05-MQS-ACCESSCOMPLI.json
L05-MQS-COGLOAD Cognitive Load Assessment MQS Measures the estimated cognitive load of generated content, balancing intrinsic complexity with extraneous load minimization L05-MQS-COGLOAD.json
L05-MQS-ENGAGESCORE Engagement Potential Score MQS Measures the predicted engagement potential of generated content based on interactivity, variety, relevance, and interest factors L05-MQS-ENGAGESCORE.json
L05-MQS-FACTACCURACY Factual Accuracy Score MQS Measures the factual accuracy of generated content through fact-checking against authoritative sources L05-MQS-FACTACCURACY.json
L05-MQS-MAYEROVERALL Mayer Principles Overall Compliance MQS Aggregates compliance scores across all 12 Mayer principles to provide an overall multimedia learning quality score L05-MQS-MAYEROVERALL.json
L05-MQS-SENSORYBALANCE Sensory Channel Balance Score MQS Measures the balance of generated content across sensory channels (visual, auditory, kinesthetic/haptic) to avoid channel overload L05-MQS-SENSORYBALANCE.json